Local Video
|
| Weighing the options on a second annexation |
By: DAVID HENKE, Staff Writer
|
Posted: Saturday, November 21, 2009 12:18 am
|
 Email  Print
|
The call went out, and the recommendations have come pouring back in.
At its meeting on Sept. 14, the Northfield City Council asked three of its boards and commissions to weigh in on the proposed annexation of 456 acres of land in Bridgewater Township owned by Kenneth Prawer and Robert Gill.
This week, the city got its answers — from a few expected sources, and at least one unexpected one. The information the boards returned to the council will be reviewed at the Planning Commission’s meeting Tuesday. It will also inform the council’s decision in January whether to approve the annexation or not.
Here’s what the Northfield Environmental Quality Commission, the Economic Development Authority, the Parks and Recreation board and a group of worried citizens have to say about the city’s plan to expand.
Environmental Quality Commission
Although the Northfield EQC refrained from explicitly approving or rejecting the annexation, the group strongly believes that any conservation or preservation efforts should be focused on the southeastern portion of the Prawer-Gill property. According to the group, the near-convergence of Spring Brook — also known as Rice Creek — and Heath Creek as they approach the Cannon River leaves little room for watershed-friendly development.
“That little piece, I think, is actually the most important part for us,” said EQC board member George Kinney. “Whatever happens out there must protect the integrity of both streams, but especially the Spring Brook trout stream.”
The group also advocated the use of buffer strips around the streams. The buffer strips around the streams could also serve as wildlife corridors.
Economic Development Authority
The decision to recommend the annexation of Prawer and Gill’s property did not come easily for the Northfield Economic Development Authority.
On Thursday, the EDA approved, 4-2, a pared-down letter recommending the city annex the land.
Board member Victor Summa and EDA Vice President Steve Engler both voted against the measure, saying that the board did not have adequate time to review and discuss the information presented by the city staff to the board concerning the property.
The EDA’s recommendation also contains information compiled by the city staff regarding the infrastructure costs and anticipated revenue of the business park, were it to be developed.
According to the analysis, the cost of extending sanitary sewer lines to the area would be in the ballpark of $2.5 to $3 million, and the outstanding debt for the construction would be financed by the connection fees collected from developers in the park. The analysis also recommended installing oversized pipes in the sewer system to accommodate any future development, at a cost of $100,000.
But those costs are more than met by the potential revenue the fully developed site would generate, according to the analysis. The potential yearly revenue for the city, if the site is developed for industrial or light industrial use, would be roughly $4.8 million. Water, utility fees and property tax revenue are included in that estimate.
NORTHFIELD PARKS AND RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD
As long as the city remains faithful to its Greenway Corridor Plan approved by the City Council in 2007 and incorporated into the city’s comprehensive plan, the Parks and Rec Board is in favor of the annexation, Chairman Rick Vanasek said.
Falling in line with the Greenway Corridor Plan, the board asks that the city create natural corridors that follow the length of Heath Creek and Spring Brook as they run through the proposed annexation.
Like the EQC, the board also feels that the city should focus its conservation and environmental protection efforts near the Cannon River. Any parkland dedicated should be located adjacent to Sechler Park to create one contiguous park system, according to the board’s recommendations.
“For the last several years, we’ve been making an attempt to establish a park system to for the community, rather than a collection of parks scattered about the community,” Vanasek said.
RICE CREEK (SPRING BROOK) CONCERNED CITIZENS GROUP
The last set of recommendations submitted to the city comes from an unexpected source: area residents concerned about the fate of the county’s only naturally reproducing trout stream, Spring Brook.
Their report, unsolicited by the City Council, asks for a more stringent set of environmental regulations on the annexed property, including continual monitoring of the water quality in both waterways, improvements in the water quality of the streams — both are currently listed as ‘impaired’ under the Minnesota Pollution Control Act — and the rehabilitation of wetlands on the property.
As with the EQC, this group did not come out in favor or against the proposed annexation — but group member Paul Jackson, who helped author the report, feels that development and concern for the environment are not mutually exclusive, if the planning is done carefully.
“If you make change, you better make the right kind of change, other you’re going to lose that resource,” said Jackson, who is also the chair of the Environmental Studies Department at St. Olaf College.
— David Henke covers city, business and youth issues. He can be reached at dhenke@northfieldnews.com or 645-1100.
* * * *
To view a copy of the Concerned citizens' report on proposed annexation, click here |
|
|
|
Story Comment Guidelines:
Registered members who identify themselves by name are authorized to automatically post comments to stories. Readers who wish to remain anonymous submit comments to a pending queue, where they will be reviewed for approval within 24 hours of their submission. To determine the author of a comment, click on the user name.
Those who identify themselves will be given broader boundaries to express their opinion. Only those anonymous comments that contribute to the conversation in a thoughtful, respectful, civil manner will be approved. The decision to approve or reject a comment is a subjective one and is ours alone. Authors of rejected comments will receive an email response.
If you would like to report abuse click here to notify us.
|
|
| Show Comments | Hide Comments
|
|
| Login and voice your opinion!
|
|
|
|
|
Top Jobs | Top Homes | Top Cars
09 Jetta
09 white Jetta asking $16,000
less than 48,000 miles
|
|
Digg
Del.icio.us
Facebook
MySpace
StumbleUpon
Google
Yahoo!
The city board reports are posted in the packet for the Planning Commission meeting. Any chance that you could post a PDF of the 'RICE CREEK (SPRING BROOK) CONCERNED CITIZENS GROUP' report here?
I am all for the acquisiton for the positive economic development that will come. As far as protectiing the environment of the streams, it seems Bridgewater management of the streams has failed. There are growing levels of phosphorus and e-coli in the streams. Left to Bridgewater's continuing management practices it will continue to grow worse. Put it under the city of Northfield with management by the concerned Boards and we can protect and enhance the streams while we reap the economic benefits.
Patrick,
Sorry the report wasn't posted earlier. It is now.
Suzy
Thanks, Suzy! I'll be glad to have a look at it!
I have recorded an interview with Carleton college to counter this gross invasion of my privacy! Why did they decided to delete my comment? I will say it again, I am not black but brown so keep you racist remarks to yourself. I also would not join the National Guard and fight a war to kill women and children for our oil interests and imperialistic ambitions. I did not consent to anybody doing a background check and have it published in your newspaper. I gave a speech and detailed how homeless people commit crimes to go to jail so they can get shelter in the winter time. What kind of journalistic integrity is this? I did not approach this paper YOU approached me so I am asking to please remove this article which has distorted facts and published subjective news for their own selfish interests.
Leonard Muya.
I DID NOT talk with Jim about "inclusion" of my criminal history, that is a blatant lie from him and the fact that you decided to delete my counter-comment after racist remarks were posted shows that have you have decided to spin this story to catch headlines for your own selfish agenda. Why would anyone comment about me being black? Who cares in this day and age? I find that offensive and will defend my integrity from unprofessional journalism from your paper that misrepresent and distort facts. You did not attend the meeting which was centered on expanding the shelter in Faribault/Northfield area and not about peoples privacy! Go ahead and get the satisfaction that you will get by lying and distorting facts, if that makes you a better person then I pray that God will open your shallow minds. I know that my records can be accessed, that it public information, and I have nothing to hide. Your newspaper's unprofessional journalism is so evident that is why Carleton college called me today morning to correct your misrepresentation and recorded a more accurate interview that depicts what I told Jim. This article was not about me but the plight of elder homeless Vets that have sacrificed to fight for our country. I did not approach your newspaper, Jim called me implying that he was reporting on the meeting we had on CAC and that is why I decided to talk to him. If I wanted to conduct an interview on my personal experiences on homeless awareness I would chosen I more reputable paper like Star Tribune and Pioneer Press.
I hope your paper has profited from my plight and that of those I camped with because one day you will pay for those you trample down.
sincerely Leonard.
PRIVACY IS MY RIGHT!!!